Showing posts with label Control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Control. Show all posts

Monday, July 4, 2011

Bristol Myers Squibb And AstraZeneca Announce Investigational Compound DAPAGLIFLOZIN Sustained Glycemic Control And Weight Reduction


Main Category: Diabetes
Also Included In: Clinical Trials / Drug Trials;  Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry
Article Date: 02 Jul 2011 - 1:00 PDT window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: 'aa16a4bf93f23f07eb33109d5f1134d3', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true, channelUrl: 'http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/scripts/facebooklike.html'}); }; (function() { var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js'; document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e); }()); email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet rated2 stars
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and AstraZeneca announced on June 25th results from an exploratory 78-week study extension of a Phase 3 clinical study that showed the investigational compound dapagliflozin plus metformin sustained greater mean reductions from baseline in blood sugar levels (glycosylated hemoglobin levels, or HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone, as compared to placebo plus metformin over 102 weeks. The reductions seen in the study ranged from -0.48 percent in patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5mg plus metformin to -0.78 percent in patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin, as compared to 0.02 percent in patients taking placebo plus metformin. Efficacy was evaluated only as an exploratory endpoint; the extension was primarily designed to assess safety. Adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation reported in the study were balanced across treatment groups, with events suggestive of genital infections and urinary tract infections more common in the dapagliflozin groups. The results were presented today at the 71st American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions.

In addition to sustained reductions in blood sugar levels, the 102-week study reported results from additional exploratory endpoints, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and mean change from baseline in body weight, which were both sustained at 102 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone as compared to placebo plus metformin.

Signs, symptoms and other reports suggestive of genital infections or urinary tract infections were more common in patients taking dapagliflozin added to metformin. These events were proactively monitored, with most patients responding to standard treatment. One event suggestive of a urinary tract infection led to discontinuation. Other commonly occurring adverse events included back pain, influenza, diarrhea, headache, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, renal impairment or failure and events of hypoglycemia. In addition, one patient treated with dapagliflozin 5 mg was diagnosed with transitional cell bladder cancer. One woman treated with 10 mg dapagliflozin was diagnosed with breast cancer.

"This study of dapagliflozin added to metformin over 102 weeks suggests that this drug has greater and sustained improvements in glycemic control and sustained reductions in body weight compared to placebo," said Cliff Bailey, Professor of Clinical Science and Head of Diabetes Research at Aston University, Birmingham, UK. "This information adds to the body of dapagliflozin knowledge and could help the medical community better understand the SGLT2 inhibitor mechanism."

The initial 24-week results for the study were presented during the 45th European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting in 2009. A New Drug Application (NDA) for dapagliflozin was accepted for review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2011 with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) date set for October 28, 2011. In addition, a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) was validated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in January 2011. If approved, dapagliflozin -- an inhibitor of SGLT2, a target in the kidney -- would potentially be the first in a new class of insulin-independent, oral type 2 diabetes agents.

About the Study

This was a 24-week Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 78-week extension. The primary endpoint at 24 weeks compared mean HbA1c change from baseline for each dapagliflozin treatment arm compared to placebo. The 78-week extension was designed to assess the safety of long-term treatment with dapagliflozin, as well as changes from baseline in HbA1c, FPG and weight over 102 weeks of treatment.

The study included 546 adults with type 2 diabetes (aged = 18) whose HbA1c was between 7% and 10%. After a two-week lead-in phase, individuals were randomized to one of four treatment groups at the onset of the study: dapagliflozin 2.5 mg (n= 137), dapagliflozin 5 mg (n= 137), dapagliflozin 10 mg (n= 135), or placebo (n= 137). Patients in all arms also received at least 1,500 mg/d of metformin. Four hundred and eighty-three patients completed the initial 24-week study. Four hundred and seventy-six patients entered the 78-week extension period, and of these 339 patients completed the extension. The completion rate was lower for the placebo group (63.5%) than for the dapagliflozin groups (68.3% ?"79.8%).

More patients on placebo (23.5%) withdrew during the extension period for lack of efficacy compared to the dapagliflozin groups (13.3%, 13.9%, and 7.6% for dapagliflozin 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, respectively). The proportion of patients rescued or discontinued for failing to achieve glycemic targets was larger for the placebo group (83/137 [60.6%]) than for the dapagliflozin 2.5 mg (71/137 [51.8%]), dapagliflozin 5 mg (63/137 [46.0%]) and dapagliflozin 10 mg (57/135 [42.2%]) groups at week 102.

Study Results: Efficacy Findings

At the end of 102 weeks, change from baseline in HbA1c in patients receiving placebo plus metformin was 0.02 percent, compared to -0.48 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, -0.58 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and -0.78 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

The mean change from baseline in FPG at Week 102 in patients receiving placebo plus metformin was -10.4 mg/dL, compared to -19.3 mg/dL for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, -24.5 mg/dL for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and -26.4 mg/dL for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

The mean change from baseline in body weight at Week 102 in patients receiving placebo plus metformin was +1.36 kg, compared to -1.10 kg for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, -1.70 kg for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and -1.74 kg for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

The adjusted percentage of patients receiving placebo plus metformin who achieved HbA1c of less than 7 percent at 102 weeks was 15.4 percent, compared to 20.7 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, 26.4 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and 31.5 percent for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

Study Results: Safety Findings

One hundred and eleven subjects per group (81.0% - 82.2%) reported at least one adverse event.

The rate of events suggestive of urinary tract infections for patients receiving placebo plus metformin was 8.0%, compared to 8.0% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, 8.8% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and 13.3% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

The rate of events suggestive of genital infections for patients receiving placebo plus metformin was 5.1%, compared to 11.7% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, 14.6% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and 12.6% for patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

Of patients treated with placebo plus metformin, 5.8% experienced at least one hypoglycemic event, compared to 3.6% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, 5.1% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and 5.2% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin. There were no major episodes of hypoglycemia.

Events of renal impairment or failure were reported in 1.5% of patients treated with placebo plus metformin, compared to 4.4% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 2.5 mg plus metformin, 2.9% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 5 mg plus metformin and 1.5% of patients receiving dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin.

One case of transitional cell bladder cancer was reported in the dapagliflozin 5 mg treatment group; none were reported in the placebo, dapagliflozin 2.5 mg or dapagliflozin 10 mg treatment groups. One case of breast cancer was reported in dapagliflozin 10 mg treatment group; none were reported in the placebo, dapagliflozin 2.5 mg or 5 mg groups.

Update on Malignancies in the Overall Dapagliflozin Safety Profile

In the overall dapagliflozin clinical program, there was no overall imbalance in malignant tumors. However, there were imbalances in two tumor types in the dapagliflozin clinical trial program. Nine bladder cancers have been observed in 5,478 patients on dapagliflozin and one bladder cancer has been observed in 3,156 patients in control groups. Six of these 10 subjects had hematuria (blood in the urine) at baseline and five were diagnosed within a year after study start. Nine breast cancers have been observed in 2,223 women on dapagliflozin and one has been observed in 1,053 women in control groups. All were diagnosed within a year after study start.

In preclinical studies, dapagliflozin was not shown to be genotoxic or carcinogenic and the investigational agent has no known off-target pharmacology. SGLT2 is not expressed in the breast or in the bladder.

About Type 2 Diabetes

In 2010, diabetes was estimated to affect nearly 300 million people aged 20-79 worldwide. Because of the aging population and the growing trend of obesity, the prevalence of diabetes is projected to reach nearly 440 million by 2030. Type 2 diabetes accounts for approximately 90 to 95% of all cases of diagnosed diabetes in adults. Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease characterized by insulin resistance and/or dysfunction of beta cells in the pancreas, which decreases insulin sensitivity and secretion, leading to elevated glucose levels. Over time, this sustained hyperglycemia contributes to worsening insulin resistance and further beta cell dysfunction. To date, treatments for type 2 diabetes have focused primarily on insulin-dependent mechanisms. Dapagliflozin acts independently of insulin.

Significant unmet needs exist as nearly half of treated patients remain uncontrolled on their current glucose-lowering regimen. Many patients with type 2 diabetes have additional co-morbidities (such as obesity) which may complicate glycemic control.

About SGLT2 Inhibition

The kidney plays an important role in glucose balance, normally filtering ~180g of glucose each day, with virtually all glucose being reabsorbed back into circulation. SGLT2 is the major sodium-glucose cotransporter in the kidney and is an insulin-independent pathway for the reabsorption of glucose back into the blood.

Source: AstraZeneca

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:



MediLexicon International Ltd Logo
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions

MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2011 All rights reserved.



View the original article here

Read More ..

Friday, November 12, 2010

Today's Op-Eds: Birth Control Coverage, 'Free' Medical Care, Profitable Nursing Homes


Main Category: Public Health
Also Included In: Preventive Medicine;  Seniors / Aging
Article Date: 03 Nov 2010 - 5:00 PDT window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId: 'aa16a4bf93f23f07eb33109d5f1134d3', status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true, channelUrl: 'http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/scripts/facebooklike.html'}); }; (function() { var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true; e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js'; document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e); }()); email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated

The Cost Of 'Free' Medical Care The Washington Times
For every extra benefit Congress has required health insurers to provide, there is an extra cost. Ultimately, we all will pay the cost of these "free" services in the form of lower wages, higher taxes or higher health insurance premiums (Matt Kibbe, 11/1).

Of Course Federal Health Care Must Cover Birth Control The San Jose Mercury News
Providing contraception makes America's women and their children healthier. It helps low-income families remain functional and self-supporting. Of course it must be covered under federal health care reform (11/2).

A Common-Sense Birth Control Policy The Minneapolis Star-Tribune
If contraception does not make the list, it's likely that many insurers will continue covering it while requiring ever-growing out-of-pocket contributions. That status-quo policy would deter women from using contraception and cause more unintended pregnancies. ... It's hard to imagine anything that more closely hews to the definition of preventive medical care than birth control. Common sense -- not narrow, misguided rhetoric -- should guide federal officials making this important decision (11/1).

The Downside Of Health-Care Repeal: Which Of These Features Would Opponents Be Willing To Lose? The Philadelphia Daily News
[C]onsidering its enemies, even this not-so-robust law still must do a heckuva lot to reduce the tactics that led to obscene profits for health insurers in recent years. As the New York Times reported this week, health-care opponents have spent $108 million -- six times that of the law's supporters -- to advertise against it. And that was after the law passed in March (Philadelphia Daily News, 10/29).

New Health Care Law Will Help Nebraska Families McCook (Neb.) Daily Gazette and KOGA
When people don't have health care coverage, they still get health care. ... Guess who that cost is passed on to? ... This [law] is aimed at changing that to level the playing field. If we didn't do something, premium costs due to health care costs are going to continue going up at double digit levels. They're going to go up in the meantime until all the insurance reforms kick in. But that won't be because of health insurance reform (Sen. Ben Nelson, 11/2).

The Real Meaning Of Rationing The Journal of the American Medical Association
Yet attempts to resist change using the specter of rationing are not reasonable because rationing already exists and is inevitable. Acknowledging that the argument is not about whether rationing is required but rather who should be trusted to ration care is a start. What is needed is intelligent discourse on what approaches to rationing work best and what values Americans most wish to express as a nation to address this problem (David O. Meltzer and Allan S. Detsky, 11/1).

Make It Clear Who Owns Nursing Homes Des Moines Register
[T]wo-thirds of homes in this country are for-profit businesses. They generally pay low wages to the workers providing care. Meanwhile, industry officials complain incessantly to state legislatures that they need higher reimbursements for Medicaid patients. They say they lose money because the government doesn't pay enough for poor residents. They must not be losing much money if profit-seeking firms consider the homes good investments (11/2).

Buck's Health Care Plan: Higher Costs, Lower Quality Care The Huffington Post
Practically every hospital, and most physicians in this country, must treat patients without insurance. Such patients rarely pay their bills, and those providers must find a way to recuperate those costs. To cover the spread, these providers raise their fees. In particular they increase fees to health insurers. And what do health insurance companies do when hospitals and physicians charge more to work with them in their network? They raise their rates. ... But despite all this, there are folks out there who still make the argument that the uninsured are simply someone else's problem. Folks like U.S. Senate candidate Ken Buck (David West, 11/1).

American Health Care: An Ethical Problem The (Danbury, Ct.) NewsTimes
American health care continues to be a profit-driven, illness-centered system ... [O]ur national health care woes will not be solved on the national level and will continue to decline unless our structure becomes patient-focused, wellness-oriented and not-for-profit (Linda Napier, 11/1).

This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.

© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

posted by SkilledNursingHome Guru on 3 Nov 2010 at 3:31 pm

This article doesn't provide all the sufficient information as to why nursing homes "can" be profitable. Just like any other business, it can be profitable IF it is managed correctly, it is no different. However, the cost of having a patient on Medicaid can vary from custodial care to HIV, wounds, g-tube, dialysis, radiation and sometimes all of these conditions together, plus medications, treatments, meals, and so on. Yes, the cost can be outrageously expensive, which is a cost that Medicaid doesn't cover. If we get the facts right as to what Medicaid covers, it is limited to room and board, no more. Therefore, if it costs $800 a day to care for a high acuity patient, multiply it times 30 days, times 50 patients, your total is a negative of $1,200,000 per month. Where is the balance found? By having good number of Medicare patients that can balance your books, plus good quality care to provide safe discharges home, and reduce long term stay high costs.
Nursing Homes 101...

| post followup | alert a moderator |


All opinions are moderated before being added.

Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:






View the original article here

Read More ..

  © Blog design by Jasa Adsense 2010

Back to TOP